This is another example of why although we need to fight on all fronts, putting a price on climate pollution is a critical tool to include in the mix. No bank would consider financing Arctic fossil fuel development if there was no profit in doing so.
You've mentioned that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rule is subject the public comment until Jan 4. Where could member of the public go to comment on this proposal? Thanks!
As it was with the Keystone XL extension. Obama killed it not because of environmental concerns, but because it wasn't economically viable.
This is another example of why although we need to fight on all fronts, putting a price on climate pollution is a critical tool to include in the mix. No bank would consider financing Arctic fossil fuel development if there was no profit in doing so.
Here's how to kick the profit out of the fossil fuel energy equation: http://citizensclimatelobby.org/basics-carbon-fee-dividend
It is also the most equitable way to transition to a global clean energy economy: http:// carboncashback.org/benefits
You've mentioned that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rule is subject the public comment until Jan 4. Where could member of the public go to comment on this proposal? Thanks!