HEATED

Share this post

Exxon's climate plan doesn't actually commit to reducing emissions

heated.world

Exxon's climate plan doesn't actually commit to reducing emissions

Its tricky language is just cover for the fossil fuel giant's real plan to increase oil and gas production.

Emily Atkin
Dec 15, 2020
25
6
Share this post

Exxon's climate plan doesn't actually commit to reducing emissions

heated.world


Forty-three years after it first became aware of human-caused climate change, fossil fuel giant ExxonMobil on Monday released a new pledge to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sort of. Kind of. Well, not really.

Exxon, the 11th-biggest climate-polluting U.S. company, announced on Monday that it’s going to reduce the emissions intensity of its oil production by 15 to 20 percent by 2025, compared with 2016 levels. In a tweet, Exxon said this was “consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement” to stabilize warming at well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Twitter avatar for @exxonmobil
ExxonMobil @exxonmobil
Today we announced our 2025 greenhouse gas reduction plans, which are consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Our plan will further reduce the intensity of upstream emissions, global methane emissions and routine flaring. exxonmobil.com/EmissionsPlan
Image
2:16 PM ∙ Dec 14, 2020
78Likes35Retweets

It isn’t, though, and the reason lies in language. You’ll notice the plan isn’t for Exxon to reduce its overall emissions by 15 to 20 percent. It’s to reduce Exxon’s emissions intensity. That means Exxon isn’t actually promising to reduce its greenhouse emissions. It’s promising to make it less carbon-intensive to produce a barrel of oil.

In fact, because Exxon’s new climate plan does not include a commitment to reduce oil production, this could still result in the company increasing its overall carbon footprint over the next five years if it significantly ramps up oil production—which, it turns out, is exactly what Exxon plans to do.

While its rivals plot long-term strategies based on renewables, “Exxon’s response has been to double down on oil and gas, plotting another huge surge in output,” The Financial Times reported in October. “Exxon is making a huge bet on oil’s future.”

Exxon has already privately acknowledged that its long-term investment plans will result in more carbon emissions. As Bloomberg’s Kevin Crowley and Akshat Rathi revealed in October, “Exxon’s own assessment of its $210 billion investment strategy shows yearly emissions rising 17 percent by 2025, according to internal projections.”

Source: Bloomberg.com

But publicly, Exxon is now positioning itself as an ally in the fight against the climate crisis, with a fancy new corporate webpage and everything.

But Emily, wait, are you saying Exxon privately acknowledges they’re doing something to worsen the climate crisis, but now is releasing public materials claiming the opposite? Well that just seems terribly off-brand! Source: corporate.exxonmobil.com

Like all greenwashing efforts, Exxon’s climate plan is an attempt to boost its social license, which oil companies increasingly need as the public becomes more aware of their huge contribution to climate change—a crisis which is projected to cause massive human suffering, economic damage, and ecological collapse if not urgently addressed.

Indeed, just 20 companies are the source of one-third of all carbon emitted since the mid-1960s—and all the Big Oil majors are on that list. Chevron, Exxon, Shell and BP are the top four investor-owned polluters, and together have caused more than 10 percent of the world’s carbon emissions since 1965.

In summary: Exxon’s climate pledge is the weakest climate pledge of all the Big Oil six; does not commit to reducing oil and gas production, which is scientifically necessary for avoiding climate catastrophe; and does not actually commit to reducing emissions at all. But the company is already using it to make themselves look like they’re not one of the biggest contributors to the climate crisis itself, and one of the biggest contributors to the political culture of misinformation, denial and gaslighting that has allowed the crisis to thrive.

The extremely weak greenwashing is pretty funny though

Here’s just a collection of things I screen-shotted while going through the pledge that made me laugh:

I may not AGREE with your choices but I RESPECT and SUPPORT them, son.

I will give these to you but I need you to know this is all your fault.

We believe this is the best way to tell you how we’re reducing emissions because it reflects the only way we’re willing to reduce emissions.

Oil and gas is the only way to make energy and climate change is not making life worse!! These are two 100 percent true statements. Exxon forever.

As a reminder, HEATED is running a 25 percent discount on paid subscriptions for the rest of the year. Sign up today and get access to the HEATED subscriber community, while supporting the growth of independent climate journalism in 2021.

Get 25% off for 1 year


Catch of the day:

Fish is not affected by greenwashing. He is colorblind.

OK, that’s all for today—thanks for reading HEATED! To support independent climate journalism that holds the powerful accountable—and to receive HEATED’s reporting and analysis in your inbox four days a week—become a subscriber today.

Give a gift subscription

If you’d like to share this piece as a web page, click the button below.

Share

If you’re a paid subscriber and would like to post a comment—or if you would like to view comments from paid subscribers—click the comment button:

Leave a comment

Looking for climate content that’s a little weirder than this? Follow HEATED on Instagram for climate memes, tweets, and pictures of food.

Stay hydrated, eat plants (I like bananas), do push-ups, and have a great day!

6
Share this post

Exxon's climate plan doesn't actually commit to reducing emissions

heated.world
6 Comments
Keith Danner
Dec 15, 2020Liked by Emily Atkin

How much do we love Emily Atkin? Very much. Very very much.

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply
Thomas L Mischler
Dec 15, 2020Liked by Emily Atkin

When I heard about Exxon's "commitment," I started laughing. Reminds me a lot of Trump's "commitment" to "drain the swamp," meaning get rid of the corruption in D.C. How'd that work out for us, folks?

Hey Exxon - want to impress me? How about a commitment to invest 80% of the profits you are making on the destruction of our planet to a) fund solutions for people living in the areas hit hardest by global warming, b) funding the development of renewable energy sources, and c) a genuine fact-checking site that uncovers the rank dishonesty perpetrated by your PR departments. I'm sure Ms. Atkin won't mind the competition.

I'll be sitting here holding my breath in anticipation of this announcement. 😎

Expand full comment
Reply
4 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Emily Atkin
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing